Sick, Twisted and Disgusting
October 17, 2006

From Stacy Harp's The Right View:

Homosexual Kills A Boy With Cystic Fibrosis

"...I wonder if homosexual activist Joe Brummer is going to highlight the murder of Joe Geeling by a HOMOSEXUAL?"...And the sad part, aside from the fact that an innocent boy was murdered by a homosexual kid, is that the article shows clearly that they are making the killer out to be a victim... Outrageous! And it's amazing that there is no sympathy for the victim in this article. In fact, this article attempts to make the killer look like a bullied victim. The good news, if you can call it that, is that the killer is going to pay by being locked up for life...which is too bad because he should get the death penalty. Sick."

Disgusting.

Stacy's post, I mean.

For someone who portrays herself as the paramount of child welfare and as a crusading advocate against sexual predators, Stacy is a rather despicable opportunist. The 14-year old in the article she links to didn't kill the 11-year old because the 14-year old was gay. He killed because he was severely emotionally disturbed, pathological, full of rage. In short, one sick fuck.

I've got far more experience as both a clinician and as a social worker. While I've never been involved in a case of child-on-child murder, I have seen and taken evidence for far too many child-on-child rapes. I know more about this subject than she does -- for that mater, so do my former interns.

In film production.

Sexual orientation isn't the issue here -- heterosexual 14 year olds rape and kill 11 year olds -- it's mental illness. Somewhere along the line, either organically, through rearing, through experience or some combination of all of the above, the 14 (now 16) year old wound up seriously unhinged. This attack and murder was the outgrowth of rage and frustration, not sexual orientation.

It's textbook, for Cthulhu's sake.

It's patently unethical for Stacy to use her position as a child advocate and a counselor to pin the psychodynamics for this rage killing on her personal bugaboo of homosexuality. There's no theoretical basis for her position. There's no clinical basis for her position. There's no forensic basis for her position. There's only her continual crusade against anything remotely "gay."

Her post is more than just wrong, it's disgustingly vile. In the furtherance of her career, her practice and her media profile, she shamelessly profits off the tragic death of a 11 year-old child who had the misfortune to encounter a seriously demented youth.

Shame, shame on her.

Posted by Jody at October 17, 2006 11:48 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://WWW.nakedwriting.COM/mt-tb.cgi/2068

Comments

Posted by: Nelson G at October 24, 2006 04:35 PM

Post a comment